I've started reading that
Frankenstein series Quazza talked about earlier in this thread. It's not terrible at least (I'm maybe halfway through Book One), but it's definitely not out and out grabbing me.
The narrative seemed a little disjointed at first (admittedly it's getting better) and I'm cringing at Koontz's massive overuse of similes and metaphors. Most are downright banal while others are made ridiculous for the sake of trying to inject some humour into proceedings. Eg. "...one hand clutching the crotch of his low-rider pants as if he were a two-year-old overwhelmed by the need to pee." This was after a gang-banger gets kneed in the balls; it seems an absurd comparison to make.
That's the other thing that is irking me, he's taking what could be a fabulously dark story and constantly throwing in lame humour that ruins that atmosphere, usually courtesy of the wise-cracking partner of the female cop character, in true cliched "buddy cop movie" style.
Now I've always preferred King to Koontz, in fact this is probably the second Koontz book I've ever read, and if is this is how is style usually is, I can't see myself trying out any more. Admittedly King is fairly heavy-handed with the similes and metaphors as well but they just seem to be a little more graphic and serious when he uses them. Plus any humour in his books is usually quite dark.
Thankfully, Frankenstein is getting slightly better as we go along, I want to find out the answers to a few of the mysteries being posed, so I hope it's going to prove it's worth.
At this stage though it's one of those books where I'm reading it as quickly as possible, not because it's compelling, but because I want to get it out of the way and get started onto other promising books I have waiting.
Which is never a good sign.
PS. I know it's probably the publishers doing so but the "comments and praises" for the author section was ridiculously egotistical in the front of this book. It was literally 10 pages of small type font of critics blathering on about how good he is. I have
never seen anything on that level before lol.
I've never really got the point of those things either. I mean, by that stage you've usually either bought or borrowed the book and got to the point of cracking it open to read it, right? It's not like 10 pages of wank over how good the author is will make you read it any more enthusiastically. If anything it's going to let you down if they fail to live up to the hype!
